Andrew Cuomo is the Attorney General of New York state and son of the former governor Mario Cuomo. Andrew was also a cabinet officer under President Bill Clinton. Andrew is running for governor.
Here is a link for his personal election website:
http://www.andrewcuomo.com/issues_and_agenda
It contains his five point plan, which include:
3. Rightsizing Government
Government in New York is too big, ineffective, and expensive.
Now contrast that with this link to his official Attorney General website "Meet my Senior Staff":
http://www.ag.ny.gov/senior_staff.html
Here are the titles of his "Senior Staff":
Director of Communications
Special Deputy Attorney General for Public Integrity
Special Deputy Attorney General for Guns and Gangs
Counselor and Chief of Staff
Special Deputy Attorney General for Civil Rights
Chief Investigator
Executive Deputy Attorney General for Social Justice
Counsel to the Attorney General
Deputy Attorney General for Administration
Special Deputy Chief of Staff
Special Counsel to the Attorney General
Deputy Counselor and Special Assistant
Executive Deputy Attorney General for the Division of State Counsel
Press Secretary
Special Deputy Attorney General for Investor Protection
Deputy Attorney General for Regional Affairs
Director of Intergovernmental Affairs
Executive Deputy Chief of Staff
Solicitor General
Executive Deputy Attorney General for Economic Justice
Deputy Attorney General for the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit
21. I may have lost count but I think it's 21. You can't make up stuff like this. And remember, this is just Andrew Cuomo's "Senior Staff".
On August 9, 2010 I had filled out a form at the website of the Attorney General of New York state, figuring I might get some attention because the office holder is running for higher office. Instead I received a PAPER letter dated August 11, 2010 from someone whose title is "Associate Director of Correspondence". Since the PAPER letter writer is only the "Associate" and since the actual "Director" is not a member of the 21 person "Senior Staff" I guess my message did not have the impact I had intended. That and the fact that the author did not provide an e-mail ID and had his phone number in miniature font size. Plus this: "We are unclear, however, as to the nature of your concerns". PAPER man could have called me. I provided my phone number. PAPER man could have sent me an e-mail message. I provided my e-mail ID. I used digital means to communicate. Why did I receive a PAPER response?
Maybe he was too busy ... attending a staff meeting. Maybe he was trying to schedule a meeting with one of those 21 "Senior Staff" people. More likely he was trying to contact one of the associates of those 21. Or an associate of one of the groups that are not important enough to be among the 21 "Senior Staff", a group such as his own: Correspondence.
Can you imagine a group named Correspondence, that is important enough to have a "Director" who is important enough to have an "Associate Director" who cannot understand a constituent's message and responds as described?
And Andrew Cuomo (Remember him?) has this as one of his five elect-me-governor points:
3. Rightsizing Government
Government in New York is too big, ineffective, and expensive.
You can't make up stuff like this.
________________________________________
The link to this message was sent to:
http://www.andrewcuomo.com/contact
Monday, August 23, 2010
Monday, August 2, 2010
Maybe we need a Dumb Democrat.
Thursday, November 6, 2008
We elected the smart guy.
http://matinale.blogspot.com/2008/11/we-elected-smart-guy.html
_________________________________
I'm starting to have a new perspective. Maybe we need a Dumb Democrat. The smart Democrats who have been elected in recent decades have not done so well: Carter, Clinton, Obama. They seem to know what to do but can't get it done. Carter was inept, Clinton and Obama too expedient. Clinton and Obama can talk themselves into and out of anything.
I'm starting to consider alternatives to Obama who shows no signs of doing anything radical enough to matter. A Dumb Democrat might be just the right balance. Someone who's dumb enough to actually try to do what is needed.
We elected the smart guy.
http://matinale.blogspot.com/2008/11/we-elected-smart-guy.html
_________________________________
I'm starting to have a new perspective. Maybe we need a Dumb Democrat. The smart Democrats who have been elected in recent decades have not done so well: Carter, Clinton, Obama. They seem to know what to do but can't get it done. Carter was inept, Clinton and Obama too expedient. Clinton and Obama can talk themselves into and out of anything.
I'm starting to consider alternatives to Obama who shows no signs of doing anything radical enough to matter. A Dumb Democrat might be just the right balance. Someone who's dumb enough to actually try to do what is needed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)